Three Major Objections To Darwinism

By Malgwyn | November 25, 2009

In this paragraph from an article titled ‘Getting over our love for Darwin’  William Dembski  points out three major problems with Darwinism:
1. How did life come from non-life?
2. The Sudden Emergence of body plans in the Cambrian explosion  and
3. The nano-engineering that was not known to Darwin.
Says Dembski, “Intelligent design supporters like me view Darwin’s theory as untrue and even as laughable: The theory purports to give a materialistic account of life’s development once life is already here, but it has a gaping hole at the start since matter gives no evidence of being able to organize itself from non-life into life. The fossil record, especially the sudden emergence of most animal body plans in the Cambrian explosion, sharply violates Darwinian expectations about the historical pattern of evolutionary change. The nano-engineering found in the DNA, RNA, and proteins of the cell far exceeds human engineering and remains completely unexplained in Darwinian terms.”
And I suppose we could a lot more like the enthusiasm to convince the public on missing links - a shame David Attenborough should get embroiled with extreme atheist claims.
But just the first point should make us ask - can it be true that Darwinism is to be taught as fact in our schools from primary up - without questioning that matter produced intelligence?

This entry was posted in Darwin's bicentenary, Faith and Science, The God Delusion. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline